Skip to main content

When I Began Asking Again | A three-part journey through God’s character, the work of Christ and the meaning of judgment.

 

When I Began Asking Again

Reconsidering what I believed about God, judgment and the reach of grace.

In 2010, I began teaching a series through Romans called “The Wrath of God Is Fully Satisfied.”

I had taught through Romans before but this series had a new title.

At the time, I believed God’s wrath had been satisfied because He had poured His fury onto Jesus instead of us. Jesus stood between us and the anger I believed we deserved.

If Jesus weren’t in the way, we would be in trouble.

Almost as soon as I began the series, I sensed God asking me a question.

“Are you sure of this?”

I knew the answer.

“No. Teach me.”

That was the beginning of my freedom to ask questions I had carried for as long as I could remember.


I grew up Catholic. I had questions then but challenging a priest felt like stepping into territory that didn’t belong to me.

Who was I to ask?

And somewhere in my understanding of faith, fearing God seemed like a healthy thing to do.

I’m smiling as I write that. But the fear was real.

By young adulthood, I had quietly settled on the conclusion that I probably wasn’t going to make it to heaven.

That was where I had landed.

In late 1993, I came to a place of full surrender to God. After a short time in a North American Baptist church, I entered an Assemblies of God Bible college the following year.

Across those experiences, I learned the hellfire and brimstone message.

Turn or burn.

After graduation, I became a pastor and carried that message into my own teaching. To some degree, I was still carrying it in 2010.

But inside, something had never settled.

I kept hoping there was more.

I had learned answers. I had taught answers. Yet the uncertainty I had felt as a child remained with me as a pastor.

Then came that question.

“Are you sure of this?”


I want to be careful about how I tell this part.

I cannot point to one verse that suddenly resolved everything. What I experienced was an ongoing conversation with Holy Spirit. Moments of understanding came as I questioned, considered and listened.

That conversation continues today.

Sometimes it begins with little more than a thought I can’t leave alone.

What if we explored this?

What am I assuming here?

Could there be something I haven’t seen?

In 2010, the first change came almost immediately.

God is not mad.

Those words were liberating.

Until then, I had understood God’s acceptance of us through the fury He had unleashed on His Son. We were safe because Jesus had received what otherwise would have come toward us.

Now I was beginning to question that picture of God.

Was His love something Jesus had made possible by absorbing His anger?

Was the Father’s disposition toward us really what I had imagined?

“God Is Not Mad At You” became so significant that we immediately added it to our signage and literature.

I wanted people to hear it.

And almost immediately, something changed in how I saw them.


I stopped putting people into categories.

Saved.

Unsaved.

Completely lost.

Maybe there’s hope.

Those categories had shaped my understanding of the people around me. Now, when I looked at someone, I began noticing their pain. Their hopelessness.

I began to see “their souls”, if you will.

I couldn’t see anyone as beyond God’s love and acceptance.

That isn’t hyperbole. It seriously changed my lens.

I began to walk in love for all. I experienced it as God loving through me.

And when I say “all”, I mean that this change reached beyond people I liked or understood.

I couldn’t even look at someone like Charles Manson and conclude that God had stopped loving him.

His crimes were evil. They needed to be dealt with. Accountability mattered. So did the lives of those who suffered because of him.

But I could no longer pronounce him beyond the reach of God’s love.

That was how far this change went.

I still had questions about judgment, salvation and what Christ had accomplished. Those questions would require more thought and exploration.

But I could no longer look at another human being and believe God had given up loving them.


You might expect that I fought hard to preserve everything I had been taught.

I didn’t.

For years, I had hoped that I was wrong about some of it—really, most of it. That my teachers were wrong. That beliefs I had inherited and passed along might deserve another look.

When an understanding fell away, I often felt relief.

It was fresh air.

That doesn’t mean everything I believe today arrived in one moment. It didn’t. My understanding unfolded over time and it is still unfolding.

I also know that the relief I felt doesn’t settle every theological question. My experience is part of my story. You deserve room to examine the questions for yourself.

Perhaps you have carried some of them.

Perhaps your understanding of God brings you peace. Perhaps it brings fear. Perhaps you aren’t sure what you believe anymore.

I won’t assume where you are.

I know how long I lived with questions I was afraid to ask.

And I know what happened when I finally admitted that the answers I was teaching were answers I wasn’t sure of myself.


I don’t tell this story because I have reached the end of learning.

Five years from now, I hope I can look back at something I believe today, laugh and say, “Dang, what a heretic!”

I want to remain willing to discover that I have misunderstood something—even something I have confidently taught.

That willingness opened a door for me in 2010.

I began a series called “The Wrath of God Is Fully Satisfied” believing I could explain why God wasn’t angry with us anymore.

Then I sensed a question I could no longer avoid.

“Are you sure of this?”

For once, I let my uncertainty speak.

“No. Teach me.”

I’m still living in that conversation.

If a belief is true, it should survive another question.

──────── ✦ ────────

You’re not becoming.
You’re remembering.
— Wag

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THE RELIGION OF SELF-IMPROVEMENT Post 12 of 12

Maybe the clearest way to end this series is this: The Gospel was never about turning people into better performers. It is about bringing dead things back to life. Somewhere along the way, many believers inherited a version of Christianity centered more on pressure than presence… More on maintaining than trusting… More on performance than union… And the result has been generations of spiritually exhausted people trying to become through effort who God already declared them to be in The Christ. That exhaustion is not accidental. Because the human soul was not designed to carry the burden of self-salvation. Not through law. Not through fear. Not through religious performance. Not through endless self-improvement disguised as holiness. That’s why Paul fought so fiercely for grace; he understood what was truly at stake. Once people move the source of righteousness, transformation and acceptance back onto themselves… the Gospel quietly turns into survival mode. And survival mode suffocates ...

THE RELIGION OF SELF-IMPROVEMENT Post 1 of 12

Falling from grace is not stepping into sin. According to Paul, it’s stepping back under the law. That changes the conversation entirely. Because most people were taught to see grace and behavior as opposing forces. But when Paul writes to the Galatians, he repeatedly contrasts grace and law as opposing mindsets instead. That distinction matters more than most people realize. Behavior is the fruit of grace… Paul was confronting the root. One mindset says: The Christ is enough. The other says: Now maintain what was given through your own effort. Grace begins with acceptance. Law begins with performance. One produces rest. The other produces striving. One creates transformation through identity. The other creates exhaustion through performance. And maybe that’s why so many believers live spiritually worn out — constantly questioning themselves, constantly afraid they’ve failed God one too many times, constantly trying to maintain through effort what was freely given through grace. Paul’s...

THE RELIGION OF SELF-IMPROVEMENT Post 8 of 12

“If righteousness comes through the law, then The Christ died for nothing.” That may be one of the strongest statements Paul ever wrote. Because Paul understood what was truly at stake. This was never just a debate about theology. It was a question of source. Can human effort produce righteousness? Can law create life? Can performance transform the human heart? Paul’s answer was uncompromising: No. Because if righteousness could be achieved through rule-keeping, discipline or religious performance, then the cross becomes unnecessary. Not symbolic. Unnecessary. That’s why Paul reacts so strongly when believers begin drifting back toward law-based spirituality. Because the moment people start placing confidence in their own ability to maintain righteousness independently, they quietly move away from dependence on grace. And that shift changes everything. The law can instruct. The law can expose. The law can define right and wrong. But it cannot make humanity righteous. Why? Because infor...